Liz led the philosophical portion and succinctly summarized and highlighted portions of the reviews Charlotte Mason had written of three different works: The Moral Instruction of Children, by Felix Adler; Education from a National Standpoint, by Alfred Fouillee; Faith, by Rev. H. C. Beeching; and an article by General Booth in Darkest England; all found in volume 2 (Parents and Children), Chapters XI -XV.
What I find to be some of the best quotes from reading and discussing those chapters are the following (including my own comments for some of them):
When my husband and I had been married for 4 years, before we had children, we spent a year in south western Russia. That in itself was exciting, but what was more exciting was the reason for our being there. In the early 1990's, when Communism had collapsed in Russia, the whole moral and ethical structure of their society collapsed with it. They had no more backbone or ruler by which to bring up the next generations of Russian children into lives of great character and integrity. So what did they do? The Russian Ministry of Education turned to Western Christians to provide them with a curriculum of Christian Ethics and Morality based on the life of Jesus Chirst. They were making no claims to validate the theology of the Bible, but they certainly recognized this very thing that Charlotte Mason said nearly a hundred years earlier, that the Bible provided a fully comprehensive "system of ethics, in precept and example, motive and sanction"! Truly a miraculous period of Russian history to have been a part of!
The Bible's position as the holy Word of God, God-breathed, living, and inspired, is, in my mind inseparable from its value as a moral code, as a literary work. He planned it that way. But in the context of this statement by Charlotte Mason, we also recognize its value as the ultimate educational tool for all children. (And through that educational tool, might it be that some will come to know the God of all Creation for themselves? We pray that it may be so.)
____________________
"I am inclined to think, too , that fairy tales suffer in vigour and charm when they are prepared for the children; and that Wordsworth is right in considering that the very knowledge of evil conveyed in fairy tales under a certain glamour, is of use in saving children from painful and injurious shocks in real life." Vol. 2, Ch. XI, p. 107
Regarding Bible stories:
Regarding a Child's Inducements to Learn:
"Probably the chief source of weakness in our attempt to formulate a science of education is that we do not perceive that education is the outcome of philosophy.../we are content to pick up a suggestion here, a practical hint there, without even troubling ourselves to consider what is that scheme of life of which such hints and suggestions are the output...What we have to do is to gather together and order our resources; to put the first thing foremost and all things in sequence, and to see that education is neither more nor less than the practical application of our philosophy." Vol. 2, Ch. XII, p. 118, 119
This is pure Charlotte Mason, a quotation we've all heard parts of so many times that it seems to almost embody the whole of what people think of when they hear "Charlotte Mason". As with so much of her writing, she addresses is so directly that it seems obvious, simple even. But we know that it is not so. Much of what we do as parents and educators comes from moment-by-moment action, not from the well thought out plan that she describes in horticultural terms here. And without that plan, there is no laying down of the rails of good habit. There is simply then a fly-by-night, come-what-may approach to education. It comes back to whether we have a philosophical spine to our educational approach, or whether we are grasping for whatever technique is current, appealing, popular, or what have you. (See the quote directly above the one I'm commenting on.) It isn't simple. Charlotte Mason doesn't say that it is, although she does present it very directly, very matter-of-factly. It it truly hard, truly challenging, and, in the long run, truly effective and rewarding.
___________________
"As we have had occasion to say before, in this great work of education parents and teachers are permitted to play only a subordinate part after all. You may bring your horse to the water, but you can't make him drink; and you may present ideas of the fittest to the mind of the child,; but you do now know in the least which he will take, and which he will reject. And very well for us it is that this safeguard to his individuality is implanted in every child's breast. Our part is to see that his educational plat is constantly replenished with fit and inspiring ideas, and then we must needs leave it to the child's own appetite to take which he will have, and as much as he requires. Of one thing we must beware. The least symptom of satiety, especially when the ideas we present are moral and religious, should be taken as a serious warning. Persistence on our part just then may end in the child's never willingly sitting down to that dish any more." Vol. 2, Ch. XII, p. 127
You heard me comment on this one at the meeting, so for fear of not stopping when I should, I'm just going to say "Stop When It Is Enough!"
"...we shall most likely be inclined to agree with his conclusion that, not some subject of mere utility, but moral and social science conveyed by means of history, literature, or otherwise, is the one subject which we are not at liberty to leave out from the curriculum of 'a being breathing thoughtful breath.'" Vol. 2, Ch. XII, p. 127-128
I simply love the last phrase here, speaking of our children as 'beings breathing thoughtful breath.' It's poetry. It's rich. It's all that I long for my children to be.____________________
Oops, so we didn't actually study Chapter XI this time - that was from a previous meeting. You know how it is, though, I started reviewing material from the meeting and it was so, well, fabulous, that I got carried away and forgot when we'd actually read the early chapter (which *is* related to the chapters we did this week). Sorry if I've confused anyone! Jennifer
ReplyDelete